Update Terbaru BLUE.. Pada Article Hari Ini Penulis Akan Memberi Anda Cerita Yang Amat Menarik Hari Ini . Jadi Mari Kita Mula Membaca.
A few days ago we saw that Joe the Plumber (representing the view of thousands or millions of Americans) prefers the Bible to science books because science books go through constant revisions while the Bible contains eternal, unchanging truth.
Of course, Joe the Plumber and company probably don't realize that, over the last few thousands of years, the Bible has gone through countless revisions, additions, omissions, translations, translations of translations, etc. And many of these, of course, are based on either innocent human error at best or ideological manipulation at worst.
When genuine science books come up with revisions, on the other hand, the reason is that new evidence has been shown to challenge some of our former ideas, and there is no sense in holding on to ideas that have been empirically shown to be deficient or at least inconsistent with other things we have evidence to believe are true.
Today we have a simple example of this idea: why Pluto got "demoted" from the status of planet to the master of the Kuiper Belt:
And if you want a more detailed explanation of our changing views of Pluto (and the reasons why), NASA has a nice video. And if Neil deGrasse Tyson is more your style, you can check him out talking about the whole Pluto debacle, including all the hate mail he's been getting from second graders, or you can check out his NOVA documentary The Pluto Files.
Bagaimana Menarikkan Article Pada Hari Ini . BLUE.Jangan Lupa Datang Lagi Untuk Membaca Article Yang lebih Menarik Pada Masa Akan Datang/
Related Posts
The Sierra Club.
The Science of Awe
Can psychologists chart what happens when nature blows your mind?
By Jake AbrAhamson
November 6, 2014The Science of Awe (via Sierra Club)
Who cares about the science of awe - it's interesting and it's fun to puzzle out these questions, bu[...]
The Atlantic is going to really offend some of my friends, but I feel pretty strongly that the hysteria around vaccines is not only misguided but anti-scientific. The increasing numbers of anti-vaxers has led to a resurgence in polio, a disease once eradicated in the United States, and measles, which for some children can be a fatal illness. Whooping cough is also on the rise again.
If you are an anti-vaxer, I hope you will read this with an open mind, and I suspect you might see yourself in the words of the some of the people interviewed.The Psychology of Anti-Vaxers: How Story Trumps Science
An anecdote from a friend can hold more weight than a recommendation from a doctor.
Vanessa Wamsley | Oct 19 2014The Psychology of Anti-Vaxers: How Story Trumps Science
I suspect this article from The Atlantic is going to really offend some of my friends, but I feel pr[...]
Alan Lightman, "The Accidental Universe" | Talks at Google
Alan Lightman (MIT) is the author of several books, and he is among my favorite science writers. Hi[...]
Massimo Pigliucci: Scientia Salon - A Manifesto for 21st Century Intellectualism
Scientia Salon is a webzine about science and philosophy. There is a very active conversation occur[...]
Nature back in July, 2014, this is a call for more interdisciplinary sharing between neuroscientists and counselors/psychologists. There is often, in my experience, very little cross-pollination of ideas between the objective science and the interpersonal/intersubjective space of treatment.
Reference:
Nature 511, 287–289 (17 July 2014)
doi:10.1038/511287aPsychological treatments: A call for mental-health science
Emily A. Holmes, Michelle G. Craske & Ann M. Graybiel
16 July 2014
Clinicians and neuroscientists must work together to understand and improve psychological treatments, urge Emily A. Holmes, Michelle G. Craske and Ann M. Graybiel.Psychological Treatments: A Call for Mental-Health Science
From Nature back in July, 2014, this is a call for more interdisciplinary sharing between neuroscien[...]
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Posting Komentar
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.